Rishika Shahi
The late Mohamed Al-Fayed, former owner of Harrods, has been accused of severe sexual misconduct by over 30 women, with a lawyer describing him as a “monster” during a recent press conference. These allegations include rape and other forms of abuse, with survivors detailing their traumatic experiences while working for the billionaire. The case has drawn comparisons to other high-profile abuse cases and raises questions about corporate responsibility at Harrods, where the alleged incidents occurred.
A Web of Allegations
During the press conference, lawyer Dean Armstrong KC outlined the disturbing claims made by former female employees at Harrods. Five women have accused Al-Fayed of rape, while others reported being subjected to various forms of sexual assault and violence. The allegations paint a picture of a toxic environment where young women were exploited.
According to Armstrong, the case had some of the “most horrific” aspects of the British broadcaster Jimmy Savile, movie director Harvey Weinsten, and Jeffrey Epstein instances. “We will state it clearly: Mohamed Al-Fayed was a monster,” he continued. However, he was a monster made possible by a system that was present throughout Harrods.”
In a statement released on Thursday, September 19, he praised Harrods’ “admission” that they had “failed these women.” However, he went on, “It’s time they accepted responsibility and made things right. They ought to take action on that as quickly as possible.
“These were the actions of an individual who was intent on abusing his power wherever he operated and we condemn them in the strongest terms. We also acknowledge that during this time as a business we failed our employees who were his victims and for this we sincerely apologize.” The owner of the store stated.
Corporate Responsibility Under Scrutiny
The legal team representing the alleged victims is pursuing a civil claim against Harrods for failing to provide a safe workplace. Armstrong emphasized that the case highlights an “abject failure of corporate responsibility,” calling for accountability from Harrods for enabling Al-Fayed’s alleged actions during his ownership.
Survivors have come forward to share their experiences, describing Al-Fayed as a predatory figure who viewed employees as his “playthings.” One woman recounted her traumatic experience as a teenager, reinforcing the severity of the allegations and the impact on the victims’ lives.
Harrods Responds to Allegations
In response to the allegations, Harrods expressed being “utterly appalled” by the claims against Al-Fayed. The department store acknowledged its failure to protect employees during his tenure and has initiated measures to support former employees who may have experienced similar abuse.
“The Harrods of today is a very different organization to the one owned and controlled by Al-Fayed between 1985 and 2010, it is one that seeks to put the welfare of our employees at the heart of everything we do.”The owner of the store stated.
“While we cannot undo the past, we have been determined to do the right thing as an organization, driven by the values we hold today, while ensuring that such behavior can never be repeated in the future.”He mentioned.
Survivors Share Their Stories
On Friday, September 20, one of the survivors, known only as Natacha, stated that she had “the opportunity and freedom to speak up” at last and that she was doing so on behalf of those who had been “silenced and suffered at the hand of the predator Mohamed Al-Fayed.” There were a lot of other women present as well.
“I was just nineteen years old. “Young, unsophisticated, and completely innocent,” she narrated how she was contacted for an interview to work for Al-Fayed. She expressed her excitement and said she “could not believe how lucky she was.”
He “was clever and highly manipulative,” according to her. He acted in a fatherly manner. He’d make what seemed like nice inquiries and offer her money for presents and new work attire.”Unbeknownst to me, I had walked into a lion’s den,” she continued. “A layer of outright sexual misconduct, deception, lies, manipulation, and cover-ups.” The chairman took advantage of the weakest people.
She underwent “an unnecessary and intrusive” physical test, but the results were never disclosed to her. “In hindsight, I was being checked for purity,” she said. At the press conference, Natacha stated that private conversations frequently “turned into more. An awkward kiss, his hands squeezing your face against his lips, or lowering you onto his lap so he could feel anywhere on your body he pleased.”
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings