Simran Joshi
Australia has grabbed international headlines by becoming the first country to pass a law banning social media access for children under 16, placing a significant responsibility on tech companies to tighten security measures or face hefty fines.
Passed in a rushed legislative process, the law has sparked widespread debate, with proponents praising its potential to curb online bullying and protect minors, while critics argue it risks isolating young users and lacks thorough planning.
Australia’s Groundbreaking Social Media Ban: A Divisive Step Toward Protecting Children
Australia has passed a landmark law to ban under-16s from social media across the country.
The law requires tech companies to make “reasonable steps” to limit access for underage users. Failing to do so could result in fines of up to almost AU$50 million ($32 million).
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that the law is intended to protect children from bad influences on the internet.
“We’ve got your back,” Albanese assured parents while underscoring platforms’ responsibilities. Social media’s misuse for bullying, scams, and predation was highlighted as a pressing concern.
The Senate passed the bill swiftly, igniting intense debate over its hurried enactment. Opposition parties generally supported the law but voiced concerns about its practical implementation.
Critics question whether banning social media entirely addresses the root causes of digital risks.
Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young accused lawmakers of putting politics ahead of young people’s welfare and inclusion. The legislative process was criticized for being opaque and rushed.
Public submissions were allowed for only 24 hours before a brief Senate committee hearing. More than 100 submissions raised serious concerns about insufficient time for comprehensive review and debate.
“Almost all submitters and witnesses expressed grave concerns,” noted the Senate committee in its report. Still, the lower house passed the bill with almost a landslide majority vote, 102 to 13.
Meta and TikTok acknowledged the government’s safety goals but criticized the rush in the legislative process. The law prohibits using government-issued documents for age verification to protect privacy and security.
A switch-off date for child accounts will be announced after further consultation with stakeholders. Parents will not be penalized for children evading the ban, but companies will be held responsible.
Wider Implications: The Balance Between Safety and Liberty in Australia’s Digital World
Although supported by 77% of Australians, the ban has been criticized over privacy and practicality of enforcement.
According to a YouGov survey, there was a strong public approval, but opinions varied on the potential impact.
“Discord and YouTube Shorts are not covered by it,” said advocate Dany Elachi.
Elachi’s group, the Heads Up Alliance, seeks to expand the restrictions to cover a more comprehensive framework. Critics say the ban will drive children to unregulated platforms where they’ll be exposed to even greater dangers.
Social media platforms said they will comply but voiced concerns about the uniform application of the rules. “Ensuring rules are consistently applied is critical,” Meta emphasized, warning against disproportionate burdens on users.
Snapchat advocated for “device-level age verification” to simplify compliance for both teens and parents. Freedom of expression for minors remains a contentious issue among digital rights groups.
X, Elon Musk’s platform, stated it isn’t heavily used by minors but defended users’ rights. Critics fear the law will scare off minors from reporting bad incidents due to fear of being penalized.
The legislation also has unclear directions on how age verification will be managed with international social media applications.
Despite opposition, lawmakers feel this is a defining moment to rein in the unchecked power of the tech giants. “The enormous power of big tech can no longer remain unchecked in Australia,” Liberal Sen.
Maria Kovacic stated. A wider consultation phase will conclude guidelines, but the challenges of enforcement for regulators are immense.
Lawmakers remain committed to refining the law to ensure it works best while ensuring individual freedoms.
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings